14urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:69C4EDC7-0CE2-5AB0-81F2-EA3B3CC9D365urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:777322AB-37CC-4A41-B3C2-83A76AAD4F84Deutsche Entomologische ZeitschriftDEZ1435-19511860-1324Pensoft Publishers10.3897/dez.68.7417474174Research ArticleArchostemataOmmatidaePalaeozoologyTaxonomyCretaceousMyanmarNew species of Omma Newman from mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber (Coleoptera, Archostemata, Ommatidae)LiYanDa1HuangDiYing1CaiChenYang12State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, and Centre for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, ChinaSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK
Corresponding author: ChenYang Cai (cycai@nigpas.ac.cn)
Academic editor: Sonja Wedmann
20213011202168234134800BBC9A0-063C-51D8-995E-C16427406350F535A41F-8DC2-420D-81B0-94EBEE461B3057659890809202118112021Yan-Da Li, Di-Ying Huang, Chen‑Yang CaiThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.http://zoobank.org/F535A41F-8DC2-420D-81B0-94EBEE461B30
A new fossil species of the extant archostematan genus Omma Newman, O.fortesp. nov., is reported from mid-Cretaceous amber from northern Myanmar. The extinct ommatid genus, Cionocups Kirejtshuk from the same deposit, is considered as a junior synonym of Omma, and C.manukyani is transferred to Omma, as O.manukyanicomb. nov. A key to species of Omma from Burmese amber is also provided.
Ommatidae is a small family in the beetle suborder Archostemata (Hörnschemeyer and Beutel 2016). In a recent phylotranscriptomic study, this family has been recovered as the sister group of Micromalthidae, rather than the superficially similar-looking Cupedidae (McKenna et al. 2019), so it cannot be included in Cupedidae as a subfamily (for alternative interpretations, see Kirejtshuk 2021). Traditionally, two extant genera were recognized in Ommatidae, i.e., Omma Newman from Australia and Tetraphalerus Waterhouse from South America (Lawrence 1999). Recently, the comparatively diverse genus Omma was split into Ommasensustricto and Beutelius Escalona et al. (Escalona et al. 2020), partly based on the cladistic analysis in Hörnschemeyer (2009). Omma has relatively short maxillary and labial palps, and the gulamentum is not depressed, while Beutelius has longer maxillary and labial palps, and the gulamentum is depressed anteriorly.
The fossil record of Omma is relatively abundant (as listed by Kirejtshuk 2020). The earliest putative Omma fossils date back to the Late Triassic (Crowson 1962; Fig. 1). Jurassic and Cretaceous Omma fossils have been reported from numerous localities across the continents of Europe and Asia (e.g., Ponomarenko 1966, 1969; Tan et al. 2012; Cai and Huang 2017). Recently, well-preserved Omma fossils have also been reported from the mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber. Based on our observation, Omma represents a relatively common genus in Burmese amber (compared with other ommatid genera). To date, three Omma species have been established based on fossil material from Burmese amber (Jarzembowski et al. 2017, 2020; Kirejtshuk 2020).
General habitus of Ommaliassicum Crowson deposited at British Museum of Natural History, under incident light. A. Holotype, I.11095a; B. Holotype, I.11095b; C. Paratype, I.11070a; D. Paratype, I.11070b; The body length is about 15 mm in both specimens.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/617031
In this study, we describe a new species of Omma in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber. The placement of some other previously published Omma and Omma-related fossils are also reviewed based on our new observations.
Materials and methods
The Burmese amber specimens studied herein (Figs 2–6) originated from amber mines near Noije Bum (26°20'N, 96°36'E), Hukawng Valley, Kachin State, northern Myanmar. The specimens are deposited in the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology (NIGP), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China. The amber pieces were trimmed with a small table saw, ground with emery paper of different grit sizes, and finally, polished with polishing powder.
Photographs under incident light were mainly taken with a Zeiss Discovery V20 stereo microscope. Widefield fluorescence images were mainly captured with a Zeiss Axio Imager 2 light microscope combined with a fluorescence imaging system. Confocal images were obtained with a Zeiss LSM710 confocal laser scanning microscope, using the 488 nm Argon laser excitation line (Fu et al. 2021). Images under incident light and widefield fluorescence were stacked in Helicon Focus 7.0.2 or Zerene Stacker 1.04. Confocal images were stacked with Helicon Focus 7.0.2 and Adobe Photoshop CC. Images were further processed in Adobe Photoshop CC to enhance contrast.
Systematic palaeontology
Order Coleoptera Linnaeus, 1758
Suborder Archostemata Kolbe, 1908
Family Ommatidae Sharp & Muir, 1912
AnimaliaColeopteraOmmatidaeF95DBFFA-6B8A-53C1-86E4-EB115A5A941AOmmaNewman, 1839(= Cionocups Kirejtshuk, 2020 syn. nov.) Type species.
Ommastanleyi Newman, 1839.
Congeners in Burmese amber.
OmmadavidbatteniJarzembowski et al., 2020, Ommaforte Li & Cai sp. nov., Ommalii Jarzembowski et al., 2016, Ommajanetae Kirejtshuk, 2020, and Ommamanukyani (Kirejtshuk, 2020) comb. nov.
Diagnosis.
Head without prominent posterior protuberances. Labrum with dentate anterior margin. Separate mentum absent. Anterior third of gulamentum not depressed. Pronotal disc with rounded lateral edges; dorsal surface without ridges or protuberances. Sternopleural suture absent. Prosternal process short. Punctured explanate elytral epipleura absent. CuA of hind wings forked; wedge cell present. Abdominal ventrites abutting.
The specific name is from the Latin ‘fortis’, meaning strong, referring to the robust appearance of the species.
Locality and horizon.
Amber mine located near Noije Bum Village, Tanai Township, Myitkyina District, Kachin State, Myanmar; unnamed horizon, mid-Cretaceous, Upper Albian to Lower Cenomanian.
General habitus of Ommaforte sp. nov., holotype, NIGP176634, under incident light. A. Dorsal view; B. Ventral view; Scale bars: 2 mm.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/617032Description.
Body comparatively wide, about 9.3 mm long and 3.8 mm wide, tuberculate, with thin setae and scales.
Head (Fig. 3A, C) prognathous, seemingly wider than long. Neck region constricted, broad. Compound eyes comparatively large, protuberant. Antennal insertions located at anterior corners of head, separated by more than three diameters of antennomere 1. Subantennal grooves absent. Frontoclypeal suture absent. Labrum (Fig. 4A) transverse, with dentate anterior margin. Antenna (Fig. 3A) long, extending beyond base of prothorax when posteriorly directed, 11-segmented and filiform. Mandibles (Fig. 4B) tridentate with vertically aligned teeth. Maxillary and labial palps short, not reaching the level of the eyes when extending posteriorly (Figs 3C, 4C); apical maxillary and labial palpomeres probably expanded and securiform.
Details of Ommaforte sp. nov., holotype, NIGP176634, under confocal microscopy, with the relative positions of the images labeled in Suppl. material 1. A. Mouthparts, posterodorsal view; B. Mouthparts, anterior view; C. Mouthparts, ventral view; D. Prothorax, dorsal view, showing the gradual change from rounded tubercles to teeth (arrowheads); E. Scutellum, dorsal view; F. Elytron, dorsal view; G. Scales, tubercles, and window punctures on elytron, dorsal view; H. Metacoxa, ventral view; I. Abdomen, ventral view. Abbreviations: el, elytron; lb, labrum; lbp, labial palp; md, mandible; mtc, metacoxa; mxp, maxillary palp; pn, pronotum; sc, scutellum; v4,5, ventrites 4,5. Scale bars: 300 μm.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/617034
Scutellar shield (Fig. 4E) subtrapozoidal, wider posteriorly. Elytra (Figs 2, 3E, F) with ten rows of window punctures; lateral edges with distinct tooth-like tubercles (dentate); surface with ribbed slender scales (Fig. 4G); punctures in the ninth row distinctly transverse; interspace between eighth and ninth puncture rows thickened (Fig. 2). Metaventrite narrowed anteriorly; discrimen present; metakatepisternal suture well developed (Fig. 4H). Metacoxae (Fig. 4H) strongly transverse with subconical mesal projections, contiguous, extending laterally to meet elytra, with weak coxal plates.
Hind wings (Fig. 3G, H) well developed. CuA forked; CuA1 fused with MP3+4; CuA3+4 fused with CuP+AA3; wedge cell present.
Legs long and slender. Tibiae with at least one well-developed spur. Tarsi long and slender; metatarsus especially long; metatarsomere 1 about as long as metatibia (Fig. 3D). Pretarsal claws simple.
Abdomen with five coplanar ventrites, separated by distinct grooves (Fig. 4I).
Remarks.
The new species can be confidently assigned to Omma. The length of maxillary and labial palps is a key diagnostic character separating Beutelius from Omma (Escalona et al. 2020). Ommaforte sp. nov. has short maxillary and labial palps, not reaching the level of the eyes, which is in accordance with Omma. The hind wing venation (especially the branching pattern of CuA) is another important character differentiating the two genera. In most beetle fossils preserved in amber, the hind wings are hidden by the elytra, and are thus not available for taxonomic purpose. Fortunately, the hind wings are partly exposed in the holotype of O.forte. In O.forte, the posterior branch of CuA (CuA3+4) is fused with CuP+AA3, closing the wedge cell, and the anterior branch of CuA (CuA1) is fused with MP3+4 (Fig. 3G), which matches perfectly with the venation of Ommastanleyi (fig. 64 in Escalona et al. 2020; fig. 4B in Lawrence et al. 2021), while the CuA of Beutelius is unforked (figs 67–68 in Escalona et al. 2020) or with an incomplete anterior branch only (fig. 4A in Lawrence et al. 2021).
Key to Omma species in mid-Cretaceous amber from northern Myanmar
1
Margins of pronotal disc and elytra without distinct tooth-like tubercles
2
–
Margins of pronotal disc and elytra with tooth-like tubercles
4
2
Body slender; mandibles comparatively elongate, projecting more anteriorly
Ommadavidbatteni Jarzembowski et al.
–
Body wider; mandibles curved more pronouncedly
3
3
Pronotal disc with convex anterior margin; elytra with narrow subexplanate epipleura
Ommajanetae Kirejtshuk
–
Pronotal disc with relatively straight anterior margin; elytra with distinct subexplanate epipleura
Ommalii Jarzembowski et al.
4
Body smaller; elytral window punctures in the second outermost row not distinctly transverse
Ommamanukyani (Kirejtshuk)
–
Body larger; elytral window punctures in the second outermost row distinctly transverse
Ommaforte Li & Cai, sp. nov.
Discussion
Extant Ommastanleyi and Omma fossils from Burmese amber are characterized by the dentate anterior margin of labrum (Escalona et al. 2020; Figs 4A, 6C). Such a character is not detected in any other ommatids in Burmese amber we examined (though it would be hard to confirm the state in other compression fossils). Thus, this character could possibly be an autapomorphy of Omma and the closely related Beutelius. The presence of scales (ribbed scale-like setae) has been suggested as a diagnostic feature separating Beutelius from Omma (Escalona et al. 2020). In the newly discovered fossil O.forte, the setae on elytra are relatively slender, which is kind of similar to that of extant O.stanleyi. However, under confocal microscopy, the ribs could be clearly seen on the flat setae of O.forte (Fig. 4G), suggesting the interrelationships among Omma and Omma-like species might be more complicated.
Numerous Mesozoic fossils have been assigned to the genus Omma. Unfortunately, as noted by Escalona et al. (2020), some key diagnostic characters (e.g., anterior depression in the gulamentum) are not easily available for many compression/impression fossils, making it hard to validate their generic attribution. Escalona et al. (2020), nevertheless, confirmed the placement of several fossil Omma species, including the Late Triassic O.liassicum Crowson. However, the key characters such as mouthparts and gulamentum are not well-preserved in O.liassicum as well. Besides, in its holotype, the propleuron is likely to be separated from the prosternum by a distinct suture (Fig. 1B). As such, we think O.liassicum cannot be confidently differentiated from Beutelius (and even some more distantly related genera, e.g., Bukhkalius Kirejtshuk & Jarzembowski; Li et al. 2021).
General habitus of Ommacf.manukyani, NIGP176635, under incident light. A. Dorsal view; B. Ventral view. Scale bars: 1.5 mm.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/617035
Kirejtshuk (2020) created the genus Cionocups to accommodate a new species from Burmese amber, Cionocupsmanukyani. He noted that Cionocups is similar to Cionocoleus, an extinct genus found in the Cretaceous of Eurasia. Cionocoleus shares a similar morphology with extant Omma, except for the lack of window punctures on the elytra (Tan et al. 2007). Cionocups, however, is clearly different from Cionocoleus in having clear window punctures on the elytra, though somewhat smaller than that of Omma. Thus, Cionocups is more similar to extant Omma, rather than Cionocoleus. Cionocupsmanukyani differs from extant O.stanleyi in antennae longer and with serration (teeth) along the lateral sides of pronotum and elytra (Kirejtshuk 2020). However, in some fossil Omma species, the antennae can also be elongated. For example, the antennae of O.lii and O.forte also reach the elytral base when posteriorly directed (Fig. 2). Besides, our newly reported O.forte also possesses teeth along the sides of pronotum and elytra (Fig. 3B, E, F). Detailed observations under confocal microscopy suggest that the difference between teeth and rounded tubercles is not always distinct, with a set of transitional states between the two extremes (Figs 4B, 6E). Therefore, we suggest that the character combination of C.manukyani is not unique enough for a separate genus. Here Cionocups is considered as a junior synonym of Omma and C.manukyani is transferred to the genus Omma, as Ommamanukyani comb. nov.
The original confocal data are available in the Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5693059).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Rong Huang for technical help in confocal imaging. We also thank Thomas Hörnschemeyer and André Nel for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper. Financial support was provided by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research project (2019QZKK0706), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB26000000 and XDB18000000), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41688103).
ReferencesCaiCHuangD (2017) Ommadaxishanense sp. nov., a fossil representative of an extant Australian endemic genus recorded from the Late Jurassic of China (Coleoptera: Ommatidae).41: 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/03115518.2016.1225251CrowsonRA (1962) Observations on the beetle family Cupedidae, with descriptions of two new forms and a key to the recent genera.13: 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222936208651227EscalonaHELawrenceJFŚlipińskiA (2020) The extant species of the genus Omma Newman and description of Beutelius gen. nov. (Coleoptera: Archostemata: Ommatidae: Ommatinae).4728: 547–574. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4728.4.11FuY-ZLiY-DSuY-TCaiC-YHuangD-Y (2021) Application of confocal laser scanning microscopy to the study of amber bioinclusions.4: 266–278. https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.3.14HörnschemeyerT (2009) The species-level phylogeny of archostematan beetles–where do Micromalthusdebilis and Crowsoniellarelicta belong?.34: 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2009.00476.xHörnschemeyerTBeutelRG (2016) Ommatidae Sharp & Muir, 1912. In: BeutelRGLeschenRAB (Eds) Handbook of Zoology, Arthropoda: Insecta, Coleoptera, beetles, Vol., 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110373929-008JarzembowskiEAWangBZhengD (2017) A new ommatin beetle (Insecta: Coleoptera) with unusual genitalia from mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber.71: 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2016.10.010JarzembowskiEAWangBZhengD (2020) An archaic-beetle ‘Jaws’ from mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber (Coleoptera: Archostemata).131: 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2020.02.003KirejtshukAG (2020) Taxonomic review of fossil coleopterous families (Insecta, Coleoptera). Suborder Archostemata: superfamilies Coleopseoidea and Cupedoidea. Geosciences 10: e73. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10020073KirejtshukAG (2021) On subfamily structure of the Cupedidae (Coleoptera, Archostemata): data from paleontology and an approach to solving conflicting classifications.4: 353–359. https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.4.4.10LawrenceJF (1999) The Australian Ommatidae (Coleoptera: Archostemata): new species, larva and discussion of relationships.13: 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1071/IT99008LawrenceJFZhouY-LLemannCSinclairBŚlipińskiA. (2021) The Hind Wing of Coleoptera (Insecta): Morphology nomenclature and phylogenetic significance. Part 1. General discussion and Archostemata–Elateroidea.71: 421–606. https://doi.org/10.3161/00034541ANZ2021.71.3.001LiY-DHuangD-YCaiC-Y (2020) Revisiting the morphology and systematic placement of the enigmatic Cretaceous ommatid beetle Bukhkaliuslindae (Coleoptera: Archostemata: Ommatidae). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 61: e20216128. https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-0205/2021.61.28McKennaDDShinSAhrensDBalkeMBeza-BezaCClarkeDJDonathAEscalonaHEFriedrichFLetschHLiuSMaddisonDMayerCMisofBMurinPJNiehuisOPetersRSPodsiadlowskiLPohlHScullyEDYanEVZhouXŚlipińskiABeutelRG (2019) The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity.116: 24729–24737. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909655116PonomarenkoAG (1969) Historical development of archostomatan beetles.125: 1–240. [In Russian]PonomarenkoAG (1966) New beetles of the family Cupedidae (Coleoptera) from Mesozoic deposits of Transbaikalia.45: 138–143. [in Russian]TanJRenDShihCK (2007) New ommatids of Ommatinae (Coleoptera: Archostemata: Ommatidae) from the Yixian Formation of western Liaoning, China.17: 803–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/10002007088537476TanJWangYRenDYangX (2012) New fossil species of ommatids (Coleoptera: Archostemata) from the Middle Mesozoic of China illuminating the phylogeny of Ommatidae. BMC Evolutionary Biology 12: e113. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-113Supplementary materials10.3897/dez.68.74174.suppl157660038CE73AE5-3C34-59BE-B2AD-C4AD48124E0E
Habitus of Ommaforte and O.manukyani, with the relative positions of confocal images in Figs 4 and 6 labeled
Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.68.74174.suppl1
PDF file
Figure S1. General habitus of Ommaforte sp. nov., holotype, NIGP176634, under widefield fluorescence. Whiterectangles indicate the regions magnified in Figure 4. Figure S2. General habitus of Ommacf.manukyani, NIGP176635, under widefield fluorescence. White rectangles indicate the regions magnified in Figure 6.
https://binary.pensoft.net/file/617037This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.YanDa Li, DiYing Huang, ChenYang Cai