Related articles by  
Other versions:

(Verbatim name)

ID

(Catalog Number)

ORG

DES

Invalid DOI was provided, please try again

XML
PDF
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CiteCite
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • FigsFigs
  • TaxaTaxa
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • Inst. CodeInst. Code
  • Article title
  • Abstract
  • Key Words
  • Introduction
  • Materials and methods
  • Results and discussion
    • Type specimens and specimen numbers
    • Not all specimens with the same number are equal
    • A unique specimen number does not imply holotype
    • Neotype designation for Netrocoryne seneca Plötz, 1882
    • Lectotype designation for Eudamus jalapus Plötz, 1881
    • Hesperia ulphila Plötz, 1883 is a nomen dubium
    • The specimen bearing a label with No. 5392 in MfN is not a syntype of Apaustus interpunctata Plötz, 1884
    • Investigations into Apaustus interpunctata Plötz, 1884, its lectotype designation, synonymy with Eutocus vetulus (Mabille, 1883) and reinstatement of Callimormus diaeses Schaus, 1902 as a valid species
    • Neotype designation for Hesperia irma Plötz, 1882
    • Questioning the type status of specimens curated as types
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories
Powered by