Research Article |
Corresponding author: Borislav Gueorguiev ( gueorguiev@nmnhs.com ) Academic editor: James Liebherr
© 2015 Borislav Gueorguiev, Riccardo Sciaky.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Gueorguiev B, Sciaky R (2015) A new genus and two new species of Pterostichini from China, with “sphodrine-like” parameres (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 62(2): 225-237. https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.62.5493
|
A new genus of Pterostichini, Apophylon Guéorguiev & Sciaky, gen. n. (type species: Apophylon schillhammeri Guéorguiev & Sciaky, sp. n.) is proposed for Apophylon schillhammeri Guéorguiev & Sciaky, sp. n. (type locality: China, SE Guizhou Province, Leishan County, SE Kaili) and Apophylon pangu Guéorguiev & Sciaky, sp. n. (type locality: China, NW Hunan Province, Wulingyuan District, near the town of Wulingyuan). These two species share a unique combination of characters, not known in any other Pterostichini. The new genus can be distinguished by having (1) a left paramere without transverse apophysis; (2) a falcate right paramere, with styloid apex, broadened medial part and subbasal hasp; (3) a median lobe with dorsal ostium; (4) metatarsomeres 1-2 setose on the medioventral surface, in addition to the lateroventral setae; (5) meso- and metatarsomeres 1–4 with two dorsolateral grooves diverging distally; and (6) elytral striae with shining isodiametric microreticulation, which is in contrast to less shining transverse-mesh microreticulation on the elytral intervals.
Carabidae , Apophylon , taxonomy, China, Guizhou, Hunan
This paper describes a new genus and two new species of pterostichine beetles from China. As frequently occurs, especially in terms of individual collections from little investigated areas, one species is described upon a single male specimen. As these species have been rarely collected in the past, we do not anticipate additional specimens to be available for study in the near future. The uniqueness of these beetles persuaded us to describe these species with a hope that this will encourage more investigations in the region.
The first author visited the Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Vienna in 2011 borrowing a small collection of unidentified carabids. Among those was a single male specimen with a habitus rather unusual for a Pterostichini found in the region. The examination of the genitalia and various characters revealed a species with retained primitive features of the median lobe of the aedeagus and parameres. The combination of characters states are evidence that the specimen in question belongs to a new species and is both generically distinctive and systematically isolated from all other pterostichines. Some years earlier, four adult specimens similar to the above specimen had been borrowed for study from the NMW by the second author. These specimens had only been partly studied since they were teneral and very fragile. The subsequent study and comparison of these five specimens showed that they belong to two related species from a peculiar lineage of the tribe Pterostichini. The following character states: 1/ mandibular scrobe without seta; 2/ basal bulb of the aedeagus closed dorsally; 3/ parameres unsetose and dissimilar in shape, left paramere conchoid; 4/ frons with two supraorbital setae; 5/ antennae filiform, with segments 1–3 without pubescence; 6/ labial palpomere 2 with two median setae; 7/ apicolateral elytral plica present, externally visible; and 8/ elytron with parascutellar pore inside base of second stria, determine the inclusion of the new taxa into this tribe.
Measurements were made with a calibrated ocular micrometer mounted on a stereoscopic binocular Olympus SZX10 microscope. Photos were taken with a Zeiss Stemi 2000 microscope equipped with an AxioCam ERc 5s camera and were stacked using the free software CombineZM of Alan Hadley (version 26 April 2008). Drawings were made using a Zeiss transmitted-light microscope.
Measurements: body length from the apex of the longer mandible in closed position to the apex of the longer elytron (BL); body width as maximum distance across the widest point of elytra (BW); linear distance from apex of longer mandibular to the imaginary line connecting the posterior end of tempora (HL); maximum linear distance across the head, including the eyes (HW); length of pronotum, measured along the midline, from the apical margin to the basal margin (PL); maximum width of pronotum (PW); width of the pronotal apex, between the tips of the fore angles (PaW); width of the pronotal base, between the tips of the hind angles (PbW); length of elytra, from the basis of scutellum to the apex of the longer elytron (EL); maximum width of elytra (EW).
The examined material is deposited in the following collections:
NMNHS National Museum of Natural History, Sofia (Borislav Guéorguiev)
NMW Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Vienna, Austria (Harald Schillhammer)
cRS collection Riccardo Sciaky, Milano, Italy
For naming the units of the female genital tract, we follow the scheme used by
Integument glabrous; frons usually with two pair of supraorbital setae (one seta in Haptotapinus Reitter, 1886, Haptoderotapinus Jedlička, 1930 and Unitrichus Sciaky, 1997, three or more setae in Rambousekiella Knirsch, 1925 and Ethira Andrewes, 1936); mandibular scrobe without seta; antennae filiform, antennomeres 1–3 glabrous (antennomere 3 pubescent in Molops Bonelli, 1810, Rambousekiella Knirsch, 1925, and a few West Mediterranean genera), scape attached to pedicel centrically; penultimate labial palpomere usually with two median setae, without apical setae (2–5 median setae and 1–3 apical setae in some species of Cyclotrachelus Chaudoir, 1838, cfr.
The lack of synapomorphies, in either adult or larval stages, yet discovered to suggest that the tribe (about 2500 species) forms a monophyletic lineage, arrives at the conclusion that it is an evolutionary grade (
Apophylon schillhammeri sp. n.
The following combination of morphological features distinguishes this taxon from all the other Pterostichini known to date:
mentum transverse, weakly emarginate;
pronotal basal impressions, lateral margins and basal part of midline, as well as the elytral striae both grooved and widened;
elytral microreticulation double, isodiametric within the striae, transverse-mesh on the intervals;
apicolateral plica of elytron large and visible;
parascutellar striola absent, i.e. striola anastomosing in full with stria 1;
angular base of stria 1 absent;
stria 7 shallow (punctiform) in anterior half;
parascutellar setiferous punctures present at base of stria 2;
no discal setiferous punctures in interval 3;
remnants of both stria 9 and interval 10 present along penultimate fifth of elytron;
meso- and metatarsomeres 1–4 with two dorsolateral grooves divergent distally;
metatarsomeres 1–2 (and sometimes metatarsomere 3) setose on medioventral surface, in addition to the lateroventral setae;
tarsomere 4 moderately emarginate along apical margin in all legs;
abdominal sternite 6 bisinuate and bordered along apical margin in both sexes, flat and smooth in males, impressed and rugose on apical part in females.
median lobe of aedeagus with dorsal ostium;
left paramere without transverse apophysis;
right paramere falcate, with styloid apex, medial part broadened and hasp situated at subbasal position;
laterotergite and basal gonocoxite 1 both with trichoid setae;
apical gonocoxite narrowed distally, with apex widely rounded, two ensiform setae, two nematiform setae, and a lots of pit pegs on dorsal and ventral surfaces.
Diagnostic feature | A. schillhammeri sp. n. | A. pangu sp. n. |
---|---|---|
A. Morphological features | ||
EL/EW | 1.64 | 1.73–1.80 |
EL/PL | 2.88 | 2.98–3.18 |
punctuation of tegument dorsally | largely impunctate (excl. head and base of pronotum) | largely with micropunctures |
microsculpture dorsally | mostly reduced, distinct only on labrum, pronotum basal impressions and lateral margins, elytral basal border and striae | developed, distinct on head, pronotum and elytra |
frontal furrows on head | wide, coarsely punctate (Fig. |
narrow, with micropunctures (Fig. |
vertex of head laterally | with several large punctures (Fig. |
with micropunctures (Fig. |
clypeal suture | partly obliterated (Fig. |
present, fine (Fig. |
punctuation of the pronotum basis, between the impressions | internal margin of each impression with a few coarse punctures (Fig. |
whole area with micropunctures and several longitudinal wrinkles (Fig. |
elytral intervals 1–3 anteriorly | flat | subconvex |
elytral intervals 2 and 8 | fused apically (Fig. |
divided apically by stria 7 (Fig. |
setiferous punctures within stria 7 | one (Fig. |
two, as apical one on very end of stria (Fig. |
prosternal process posterior margin | rounded | nearly straight |
median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view | more arcuate ventrally (Figs |
less arcuate ventrally (Figs |
apical lamella of aedeagus in dorsal view | subquadrate at tip, with a left sided lobe (Fig. |
nearly rounded at tip, without prominent lobe (Fig. |
internal sac of aedeagus | with a large, well chitinized lamella (Fig. |
without lamella (Fig. |
right paramere | more attenuate apically, moderately broadened medially (Figs |
shortly attenuate apically, strongly broadened medially (Figs |
B. Geographical features | ||
Area of distribution (river valley) | Yuan River Watershed: upper Qingshui River Basin (Fig. |
Lishui River Watershed: Suoxi River Basin (Fig. |
Apophylon gen. n. schillhammeri sp. n. from vil. Fangxiang, Guizhou, China, holotype. 4 Apex of elytra (a preapical puncture in stria 7; b apical setiferous puncture behind end of stria 7; c fused intervals 2 and 8); 5 Left metatarsus, ventral view; 6 Right mesotarsus, dorsal view; 7 Abdominal sternites 4–6, ventral view. Scale lines: 1 mm (Figs 4–7).
Apophylon gen. n. schillhammeri sp. n. from vil. Fangxiang, Guizhou, China, holotype. 8–10. Aedeagus (8 left lateral view; 9 right lateral view; 10 dorsal view; a median lobe; b right paramere, internal face; c left paramere, external face; d left paramere, internal face; e right paramere, external face). Scale lines: 1 mm (Figs 4–10).
Apophylon gen. n. pangu sp. n. from Zhangjiajie national Forest Park, Hunan, China, holotype. 11 Habitus; 12 Head and pronotum; 13 Apex of left elytron (a apicolateral plica; b preapical puncture in stria 7; c apical setiferous puncture at end of stria 7; 1–10 numeration of intervals); 14–16. Aedeagus with attached parameres (14 left lateral view; 15 right lateral view; 16 dorsal view; a left paramere; b right paramere). Scale lines: 3 mm (Fig. 11); 1 mm (Figs 12–16).
Apophylon gen. n. pangu sp. n. from Zhangjiajie national Forest Park, Hunan, China, female paratype. 17 Abdominal sternites 5–6, ventral view; 18 Postabdominal sternite 7, dorsal view; 19 Gonocoxae, ventral view; 20 Left gonocoxa and left laterotergite, ventral view; 21 Left gonocoxite 2, ventral view. Scale lines: 1 mm (Figs 17–18); 0.3 mm (Figs 19–20); 0.1 mm (Fig. 21).
Habitus. Size medium (ca. 12.5–13.5 mm) for Oriental Pterostichini, shape elongate, subparallel (Figs
Apophylon is a compound word, based on the Greek prefix ἀπό [apó] (away from, separate) and φύλον [fýlon] (tribe, clan), alluding to the putative systematic remoteness of this taxon concerning its relatives. It is treated as a Greek neuter.
Holotype ♂, well-preserved (metarsomeres 3 and 5 of the left hind leg were lost after taking Fig.
See Table
(based on male only). Habitus (Fig.
Data about variation in measurements and ratios among the species of Apophylon gen. n.
Measurement and ratios | A. schillhammeri sp. n. | A. pangu sp. n. | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HT♂ | HT♂ | 1PT♀ | 2PT♀ | 3PT♀ | range | mean | |
BL (mm) | 12.6 | 13.1 | 13.8 | 13.1 | 13.8 | 13.1–13.8 | 13.45 |
BW (mm) | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4–4.5 | 4.43 |
PW/HW | 1.37 | 1.39 | 1.4 | 1.45 | 1.38 | 1.38–1.45 | 1.41 |
PW/PL | 1.29 | 1.25 | 1.26 | 1.29 | 1.25 | 1.25–1.29 | 1.26 |
PW/PaW | 1.47 | 1.49 | 1.43 | 1.47 | 1.38 | 1.38–1.49 | 1.44 |
PW/PbW | 1.4 | 1.42 | 1.37 | 1.43 | 1.38 | 1.37–1.43 | 1.4 |
PbW/PaW | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.04 | 1.02 | 1 | 1.00–1.05 | 1.03 |
EL/EW | 1.64 | 1.73 | 1.8 | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.73–1.80 | 1.77 |
EL/PL | 2.88 | 2.98 | 3.06 | 3.18 | 3.08 | 2.98–3.18 | 3.08 |
EW/PW | 1.4 | 1.38 | 1.34 | 1.4 | 1.38 | 1.34–1.40 | 1.38 |
A noun in the genitive case for the collector of the holotype of this new species, the prominent specialist of Staphylinidae Harald Schillhammer.
Harald Schillhammer (personal communication) kindly provided us detailed description for the site and time when the holotype of A. schillhammeri sp. n. was collected: “9) SE Kaili, Leishan Co., NE Leishan, E - slope of Leigong Shan, 26°26.59’N, 108°16.53’E, ca. 900 m, Nanmang river at and above Fangxiang village, ca. 15-20 m wide, variably fast flowing, slightly polluted by surrounding farmland. 16.6.2001, leg. Schillhammer & Wang; 10) as 9), gravel banks, large-sized stones (up to 50 cm diameter), with interstitial of fine sand and clay. 16.6.2001, leg. Schillhammer & Wang”.
According to this information, the correct GPS coordinates of the type locality are 26°26.59’N, 108°16.53’E, which differ from the data written on the label pinned under the specimen (see “Type material”). In reality, it was an error in the process of printing the labels (Harald Schillhammer, personal communication).
The small river of Nanmang flows into the upper part of the basin of the Qingshui River. The Qingshui enters the Yuan River, which is one of the main tributaries of the Yangtze River in Hunan. Most probably, the species is a hygrophilous upland dweller that lives adjacent to water. Administratively, the type locality is in Leishan County, Qiandongnan Miao and Dong Autonomous Prefecture, south-eastern part of Guizhou Province, China (Fig.
Holotype ♂, well-preserved, no part missing, “CHINA, NW-Hunan 1993 Wulingyuan, N Dayong Zangjiajie, 30.10., 450m leg. Schillhammer (4)” [printed, white] / “HOLOTYPE Apophylon gen. nov. pangu sp. nov. Guéorguiev & Sciaky des. 2015” [printed, red]. Paratypes 3♀♀, each one supplied with a first label as that of the holotype, and with a second label: “PARATYPE Apophylon gen. nov. pangu sp. nov. Guéorguiev & Sciaky des. 2015” [printed, red]. The holotype and one paratype are preserved in NMW, while the other two paratypes are deposited in NMNHS and cRS, respectivelly. The genitalia of the holotype are preserved in Euparal on a separate piece of plastic pinned under the card on which the specimen is mounted.
See Table
Habitus (Fig.
A noun in the nominative for the Chinese deity Pangu or Pan Gu, who is the first living being and the creator of everything in some versions of Chinese mythology.
The field notebook of Harald Schillhammer (personal communication) indicates the following data about the site and time when the type series of A. pangu sp. n. was collected: “Zhangjiajie Forest National Park, Suoxiyu Nature Reserve, Wulingyuan section (ca. 30 km N Zhangjiajie City); ca. 2 km downstream of Shuiraosimen; small branch of Jinbian Xi, ca. 1–2 m wide, slowly flowing, with riffle areas and pools; 30.X.1993; leg. Schönmann, Schillhammer & Ji; [4]”. According to Harald Schillhammer (personal communication), the altitude of the site of collecting is ca. 450 m and approximate GPS coordinates are 29°21.10’N, 110°29.06’E. This site is located near Wulingyuan Town, Wulingyuan District, Zhangjiajie Prefecture, north-western part of Hunan Province, China (Fig.
The rivers of Shuiraosimen and Jin Bian Xi flow into the basin of the Lishui River (or Li River), which is one of the main tributaries of Yangtze River in Hunan. Most probably, as its congener, the species is a hygrophilous lowland dweller that lives adjacent to water.
We note that the description of A. pangu is based on teneral specimens. Hence, some observations, such as micropunctation, microsculpture, color and luster, structure of internal sac of aedeagus, may differ in fully sclerotized adults.
The two new species exhibit several peculiar characters which are described below according to their phylogenetic significance. At least the last two of them are suggested to be apomorphic.
1) Left paramere without transverse apophysis, with apical denticle on ventral margin.
According to
2) Right paramere falcate, with styloid apex, medial part broadened and hasp situated subbasaly on the internal face.
This specific shape of right paramere is unknown among the Holarctic and Oriental Pterostichini, though a few species are somewhat similar. Pterostichus (Neohaptoderus) kleinfeldianus Sciaky & Wrase, 1997 (
It is worth noting that the form of the right paramere of Apophylon gen. n. greatly resembles right parameres of some species belonging to Sphodrina (see
3) Median lobe of aedeagus with ostium situated on the dorsal side.
The dorsal position of the ostium is hypothesized as the plesiomorphic state for pterostichines (
4) Metatarsomeres 1–2 (and sometimes metatarsomere 3) setose on medioventral surface, in addition to the lateroventral setae.
We did not find this feature in the Pterostichini examined, except for two genera of the Mediterranean subtribe Euchroina and a single species of “Trigonotomini”. All examined species of Orthomus Chaudoir, 1838, and the only species of Parorthomus Guéorguiev, Wrase, Farkač, 2014 possess mesotarsomere 1 and metatarsomeres 1-2 setose on ventral surface beside the lateroventral setae. Trigonotoma lewisii Bates, 1873, also possesses this character and its distribution is like in Orthomus, while other two species of “Trigonotomi”, Lesticus serraticollis (Chaudoir, 1868) and Lesticus beroni Dubault, Lassale, Roux, 2012, do not exhibit this character.
This feature is widespread among taxa of the tribe Platynini Bonelli, 1810, a group which is not closely related to the Pterostichini.
5) Meso- and metatarsomeres 1–4 with two dorsolateral grooves divergent distally.
This condition occurs in the two species of Apophylon gen. n. and seems to be an autapomorphy in regard to Pterostichini. Many Eurasian pterostichines that we have examined possess a groove only on the external side of metatarsomeres 1–3 or 1–4. Usually a groove is wanting on the inner side of the metatarsomeres. However, some taxa, among them the Western Mediterranean species Poecilus purpurascens s.l. (Dejean, 1828), P. decipiens s.l. Waltl, 1835 and P. pantanellii (A. Fiori, 1903), from the subgenera Carenostylus Chaudoir, 1838, Parapedius Seidlitz, 1887 and Metapedius A. Fiori, 1903 of genus Poecilus, respectively, possess nearly the same character state as that observed in the new genus. Interestingly, this condition is not present in species from the remaining subgenera of Poecilus, so it may be a mark of close relationships between the aforementioned three subgenera. On the other hand, it is not indication for relation between the last and the new genus for reasons below discussed.
Six Palearctic species of Argutor Dejean, 1821 (Bousquet 2004: 648) also possess a groove on the inner side of meso- and metatarsomeres 1-5. Moreover, the same species of Argutor have a dorsal groove on tarsomeres 1–5 in all legs. Bousquet (ibid.) suggested that the last state is: “unusual in the genus Pterostichus and is probably apomorphic. It suggests that these species form a monophyletic group within the subgenus”. There are some striking differences between the tarsal grooves in Argutor and those in Apophylon gen. n., thus this does not provide any evidence for a relationship between these taxa. The meso- and metatarsal grooves in Argutor are: a/ three; b/ lateral grooves are situated each to other at 180˚ regarding the tarsal axis, so they are parallel. The grooves in Apophylon are: a/ only two; b/ situated laterally on the dorsal surface; d/ convergent towards the base of each tarsal segment and divergent towards its apex. In addition, a dorsal groove is absent on the tarsomeres in the new species.
According to
6) Elytral striae with shining isodiametric microreticulation, in contrast to less shining, transverse-mesh reticulation on elytral intervals.
This pattern and distribution of the microreticulation on the tegument is unknown to us and it is likely a result of a microevolution peculiar only to this lineage.
The lack of knowledge about both the female genital tract and the larval characters prevent us from making more precise conclusions about the systematic position of the new genus. There are only a few facts that might be interpreted with certainty. The lack of transverse apophysis on the left paramere in the new species is a plesiomorphic character state rather than apomorphic (
A close affinity between the new genus from China and the genus Poecilus is unlikely because of the lack of the parascutelar striola and seta on the metatrochanter in the former (both features present in the latter), as well as for the lack of medioventral pubescence on the metatarsomeres 1–3 and the shallow frontal furrows on the head in the latter (both features differently stated in the former). In addition, the taxa of Poecilus s.str. have antennomeres 1–3 or at least some of them carinate medially; this state is not present in the genus herewith described.
At the moment there is no solid evidence to bring Apophylon gen. n. closer to any of the Gondwanaland branches of the Pterostichini. The new genus is distinct from the genera of subtribe Euchroina (sensu
Further, there are some important similarities which are worth mentioning between the genus from Guizhou and Hunan and several other pterostichine genera from the Australasian and American continents. The most striking morphological resemblance that we found is with the American Hybothecus Chaudoir, 1874, realizing that it could be partly due to the detailed generic characteristics given by
Some Australian genera (Rhytisternus Chaudoir, 1865, Rhytiferonia Darlington, 1962, Liopasa Tschitschérine, 1901, and Cratogaster Blanchard, 1843,
At the present status of knowledge, it is impossible to propose what may be the adelphotaxon of Apophylon gen. n. and thereby determine its close relatives. Therefore, we treat this genus as incertae sedis within the Pterostichini. On the other hand, it seems that the genus may be the only relict of an early taxonomic branch of the “Angarian” (Asiatic-European) provenance. Whether or not this branch has other extant descendants is not clear. Finally, we note that its systematic position cannot be examined in more depth until a major phylogenetic analysis can be undertaken either by a more detailed morphological analysis, by a molecular analysis, or desirably, by both.
We thank Harald Schillhammer (NMW) for providing us with precise descriptions of sites and habitats where he collected the new species, Kipling Will (Essig Museum of Entomology, University of California, Berkeley, United States of America) for the interesting discussion regarding the relations of the new taxa with southern hemisphere Pterostichini, and David Baker (Danyang, South Korea) for kindly helping us checking the English style of a preliminary draft of this paper. A previous draft of the work was reviewed by Kipling Will and James Liebherr (Cornell University, Ithaca, United States of America). We are very grateful them for the many thoughtful critical comments about both style and content. The first author thanks Heinrich Schönmann (NMW) and again Harald Schillhammer (NMW) for their help during his visits in NMW and for the loans of material. SYNTHESYS, the European Union-funded Integrated Infrastructure Initiative grant under FP7 provided funding to support the visit of one of us (BG) to NMW (AT-TAF-1470).